AI Design 10 Min. Lesezeit Aktualisiert 28. März 2026

Midjourney vs DALL-E 3 vs Stable Diffusion

Die drei Top-KI-Bildgeneratoren im direkten Vergleich: Qualität, Kontrolle, Preise und kreative Flexibilität. Welcher passt zu deinem Workflow?

Unser Pick

Sieger: Midjourney

Midjourney gewinnt insgesamt mit seiner konstant atemberaubenden Bildqualität, die kaum Prompt-Engineering braucht. DALL-E 3 ist die bessere Wahl für Entwickler, die API-Zugang und präzises Text-Rendering brauchen, während Stable Diffusion der Traum für Power-User ist — mit unvergleichlicher Anpassbarkeit und null Kosten beim Self-Hosting. Für die meisten Kreativprofis liefert Midjourney die besten Ergebnisse mit dem geringsten Aufwand.

Midjourney logo
Midjourney 9/10
DALL-E 3 logo
DALL-E 3 8.2/10
S
Stable Diffusion 8.5/10

Feature-Vergleich

Direkte Gegenüberstellung der wichtigsten Features, Preise und Funktionen.

Pricing
Monthly cost or pricing model
M
Midjourney
Basic $10/mo / Standard $30/mo / Pro $60/mo
D
DALL-E 3
ChatGPT Plus $20/mo or API credits ($0.04-0.08/image)
S
Stable Diffusion
Free (open source) / Stability API from $0.01/image
Image Quality
Overall aesthetic quality and coherence
M
Midjourney
Exceptional — industry-leading aesthetics
D
DALL-E 3
Very Good — clean, accurate results
S
Stable Diffusion
Good to Excellent — depends on model and setup
Art Styles
Range and quality of artistic styles
M
Midjourney
Wide range with stunning defaults
D
DALL-E 3
Good range, tends toward clean digital art
S
Stable Diffusion
Unlimited with custom models and LoRAs
Max Resolution
Highest native output resolution
M
Midjourney
Up to 2048x2048 (with upscaling)
D
DALL-E 3
1024x1024, 1024x1792, 1792x1024
S
Stable Diffusion
Unlimited (hardware-dependent)
API Access
Programmatic generation for developers
M
Midjourney
No official API
D
DALL-E 3
Full REST API via OpenAI
S
Stable Diffusion
Self-hosted API or Stability AI API
Commercial Use
Licensing for commercial projects
M
Midjourney
Yes (paid plans)
D
DALL-E 3
Yes (usage policy applies)
S
Stable Diffusion
Yes (fully permissive open license)
Speed
Average generation time per image
M
Midjourney
~15-30 seconds
D
DALL-E 3
~15-45 seconds
S
Stable Diffusion
~5-60 seconds (hardware-dependent)
Text in Images
Ability to render readable text within generated images
M
Midjourney
Improving but inconsistent
D
DALL-E 3
Best in class — accurate text rendering
S
Stable Diffusion
Poor without specialized models
Customization
Fine-tuning, custom models, and advanced control
M
Midjourney
Style references and parameters
D
DALL-E 3
Limited to prompt engineering
S
Stable Diffusion
Full control — LoRAs, ControlNet, fine-tuning
Ease of Use
How easy it is to get started and produce quality results
M
Midjourney
Easy — great defaults, minimal setup
D
DALL-E 3
Easiest — natural language via ChatGPT
S
Stable Diffusion
Hard — requires setup and technical knowledge

Tiefer Blick

Pro, Contra und was jedes Tool einzigartig macht.

M

Midjourney

9/10 Sieger
Midjourney testen

Pro

  • Best-in-class aesthetic quality — images are consistently stunning
  • Exceptional at photorealistic and artistic styles
  • v6.1 model produces highly detailed, coherent outputs
  • Strong community for prompt inspiration and techniques
  • Web app with editor for inpainting, outpainting, and variations
  • Fast generation times (under 30 seconds for standard images)

Contra

  • No free tier — starts at $10/month
  • No official API for programmatic access
  • Text rendering in images still inconsistent
  • Less control over specific composition details vs Stable Diffusion
  • Discord-based workflow can feel clunky (though web app is improving)
D

DALL-E 3

8.2/10
DALL-E 3 testen

Pro

  • Best text rendering of any AI image generator
  • Native integration with ChatGPT for conversational prompting
  • Full API access for developers (via OpenAI API)
  • Excellent prompt understanding — follows complex instructions accurately
  • Built-in content safety filters
  • Available in ChatGPT Plus, Teams, and Enterprise plans

Contra

  • Image quality / aesthetic polish behind Midjourney
  • Limited style control compared to Stable Diffusion
  • No inpainting or outpainting in the API
  • Generations can feel somewhat generic or 'clean'
  • Credit-based pricing can add up quickly at scale
S

Stable Diffusion

8.5/10
Stable Diffusion testen

Pro

  • Fully open source — run locally with no API costs
  • Unmatched customization with LoRAs, ControlNet, and fine-tuning
  • SDXL and SD3 models rival commercial quality
  • Massive community creating models, extensions, and workflows
  • Complete creative freedom — no content restrictions when self-hosted
  • ComfyUI and Automatic1111 provide powerful node-based workflows

Contra

  • Steep learning curve for advanced features and workflows
  • Requires powerful GPU for local generation (8GB+ VRAM recommended)
  • Base model quality requires fine-tuned models to match Midjourney
  • Setup and configuration can be complex for beginners
  • No official commercial support (community-driven)

Welches Tool solltest du wählen?

Das beste Tool hängt von deinen spezifischen Anforderungen ab. Hier sind unsere Empfehlungen.

Best for Professional Creative Work

Designers, marketers, and creatives who need consistently beautiful images without technical overhead. Midjourney's aesthetic quality is unmatched for hero images, concept art, and marketing visuals.

Empfohlen: Midjourney

Best for Developers & Product Teams

If you need to integrate image generation into an app, DALL-E 3's robust API, excellent prompt following, and text rendering make it the go-to choice for programmatic use cases.

Empfohlen: DALL-E 3

Best for Maximum Control & Customization

Artists and technical users who want full creative control — custom models, ControlNet poses, fine-tuned styles, and no content restrictions — will find Stable Diffusion's open ecosystem unbeatable.

Empfohlen: Stable Diffusion

Best on a Budget

Running Stable Diffusion locally is completely free (minus hardware costs). For those with a GPU, it offers unlimited generations at zero ongoing cost.

Empfohlen: Stable Diffusion

Fazit

Midjourney gewinnt insgesamt mit seiner konstant atemberaubenden Bildqualität, die kaum Prompt-Engineering braucht. DALL-E 3 ist die bessere Wahl für Entwickler, die API-Zugang und präzises Text-Rendering brauchen, während Stable Diffusion der Traum für Power-User ist — mit unvergleichlicher Anpassbarkeit und null Kosten beim Self-Hosting. Für die meisten Kreativprofis liefert Midjourney die besten Ergebnisse mit dem geringsten Aufwand.

#1
Midjourney 9
#2
Stable Diffusion 8.5
#3
DALL-E 3 8.2

Bereit zum Ausprobieren?

Offenlegung: Einige Links auf dieser Seite sind Affiliate-Links. Wir erhalten möglicherweise eine Provision ohne zusätzliche Kosten für dich, wenn du über unsere Links einkaufst. Das beeinflusst weder unsere Reviews, Bewertungen noch Vergleiche. Wir testen und bewerten jedes Tool unabhängig.

Weitere Vergleiche